Guidelines to assessment caries risk

 

As a carpenter chooses his tools for work, we choose the indicators to assess the risk of caries. In the following table the reader will notice that the infographic has a different size, due to the weight of each indicator to determine caries risk:

Patient level caries risk factors  (extraoral) 

Patient's risk status

Low risk

Moderate risk

High risk

Head and Neck Radiation

NO

State in which it is not considered that the individual is definitively at low or definitively high risk of developing new lesions of caries or progression of the lesion.

YES

Patients with motor disability, which makes their dental care difficult or who depends on third parties.

NO YES

For children: high caries experience of mothers or caregivers

NO YES

The child is put to sleep with a bottle that has added sugar

NO YES

Symptomatic-driven dental attendance

NO YES

Social-economic status / Health access barriers

NO YES

Plaque control record 

(Double tone)

O´Leary index

< = 20%

> 20%

 Occlusal plaque index

 <= 1

>= 2

Exposed to topical fluoride

(Self-Care)

Tooth brushing 2/day with a fluoride toothpaste (≥ 1,500 ppm F-) YES NO
Tooth brushing 2/day with a fluoride mounthrinse(0,05% F-) YES NO

One-to-one dietary intake interventions

Snacks with sugar between meals

< 3 > = 4

 Consistency of sugars

Solution

Sticky

Amount of sugar daily

< 30 grams > 30 grams

Sugar substitutive

YES NO

Intraoral level caries risk factors

Patient's risk status

Low risk

Moderate risk

High risk

PUFA (Exposed Pulp, Ulceration, Fistula, Absess) – Dental sepsis

NO

State in which it is not considered that the individual is definitively at low or definitively high risk of developing new lesions of caries or progression of the lesion.

YES

Caries experience

and

Active lesions

ICDAS code 1 and 2

Detenida

Active
 ICDAS code 3 and 4

Detenida

Active
 ICDAS code 3 and 4

Detenida

Active

Amount plaque

Silness -Löe index

<  = 1 > = 2

Quantificate waste, plaque and dental calculus

Simplificed Oral Higiene Index

= 0 > = 1

Microbiological Test

GC Saliva-Check Mutans® 

Positive
  4
<= 10  
  5
>= 10  

Negative

Restaurations done three years go

NO Yes

Exposed root surface

NO Yes

Hypo-salivation/Gros indicators of dry mouth  

No stimulated saliva  test  >0.25 ml./minute  <0.25 ml./minute
Stimulated saliva test  >1 ml./minute <1 ml/minute

Appliances, restorations and other causes of increased biofilm retention  

NO Yes

Note: Risk factors in red denote a factor that is always classified as a high caries risk.

D.D.S. Marcelo Alberto Iruretagoyena

Questions for the interview (24-hour method):

In this method, the patient is asked about the intake of food on a normal day. Each intake is related to the patient's habits and social situation, for example, the morning meal, the consumption in the trip to work, snacks between meals and snacks during work. Try to understand why certain articles seem necessary and aim to correct said diet scheme.

One way to do it is through the following diet story:

  1. Breakfast: What do you drink and what do you eat?
    Sugar: How much?

  2. What do you drink, eat or chew between breakfast and lunch?
    Sugar: How much?

  3. Lunch: What do you drink and what do you eat?
    Sugar: How much?

  4. What do you drink, eat or chew between lunch and snack?
    Sugar: How much?

  5. Snack: What do you drink and what do you eat?
    Sugar: How much?

  6. What do you drink, eat or chew between your snack and dinner?
    Sugar: How much?

  7. Dinner: What do you drink and what do you eat?
    Sugar: How much?

  8. What do you drink, eat or chew after dinner and before going to bed?
    Sugar: How much?
    Brush your teeth before going to bed?

  9. What do you drink, eat or chew during the night if you wake up?
    Sugar: How much?

The premise of this survey is to reduce the daily frequency of food intake containing fermentable carbohydrates (sugar). Frequency is called the number of times the patient eats the food rich in sugar on the day (24 hours). This is also known as sugar moment.

The questions in the questionnaire determine the amount of food the patient eats between meals (snacks). If you answer all of these questions that you eat certain food that has sugar, our patient has more than 5 sugar moments between meals (24 hours). risk of having new cavities.

Then you should eliminate sugar from snacks or snacks: "Snacks between meals containing sugar should be less than 3 in 24 hours"

  1. You can substitute snacks with sugar for snacks with sweeteners. (low calories, sugar free)
  2. You can eliminate sugar snacks from your daily diet, but so that you do not have an appetite between meals, you should have the four most substantial central meals of the day.

The professional must understand that a healthy diet is difficult to accept by our patients. They do not usually associate the risk of caries with fermentable carbohydrates (sugar). Only the repetition of the information, about the healthy diet and its future benefits, can change a nutritional habit.

A low sugar intake is desirable from a karyological point of view. (SIGN 1 ++, GRADE A) 57

A low frequency of sugar is desirable from a cariological point of view. According to WHO studies, "Caries in children does not happen when the consumption of national sugar is below 10 kg per capita per year, or about 30 grams per day, but an increase of 15 kg produces a significant increase in tooth decay" (220) On the other hand, with effective preventive programs it is possible to increase the consumption of sugar, without producing an increase in caries. (see, for example, the relationship between the consumption of sugar and cavities in Iceland on the WHO Oral Health Country Profile Program website).

The problem of the concentration of carbohydrates, sugar in relation to caries is complex. Experimental studies have shown that there is a correlation between carbohydrate intake and enamel demineralization (221). Also, a high glucose concentration hinders the natural protective mechanism of the mouth (222). In this study, rinsings were performed with different concentrations of glucose, from 0.3% to 50%. The 0.3 and 0.5% mouthwashes were removed from the oral cavity in a time of 3 minutes, while the 50% glucose mouthwashes were eliminated in a longer period, approximately 27 minutes.

On the other hand, there is no increase in plaque, but low pH of the plaque is prolonged over time. The different concentration of carbohydrates in the meals plays an important role for the development of caries. (223)

Carbohydrates are the main energy source for oral bacteria and can reduce the pH of the critical level. Some carbohydrates are of particular interest:

 Fermentable carbohydrates

Carbohydrates

Chemical form

Bacterial metabolism (Streptococcus mutans)

Cariogenicity

Metabolic process

Final metabolic product

Glucose

Hexose

Anaerobic glycolysis

Lactic acid
 

+

Fructose

Hexose

Anaerobic glycolysis

Lactic acid

+

Starch 

Glucose polymer (C 1-4 bond)

Degradation by amylase (glucose)

Glucose - Lactic acid
 

+

Cellulose

Glucose polymer (B 1-4 bond)

None

None

-

Saccharose (sugar)

Disaccharide of the most fructose glucose (bond 1-2)

Glucolysis + Synthesis of extracellular polysaccharides. Synthesis of intracellular polysaccharides.

Lactic acid + extracellular glucan or extracellular fructan + extracellular amylopectin.

++++

The use of sugar substitutes results in a low production of acids.

To reduce the risk of dental caries, great efforts have been made to find suitable substitutes for sucrose. The advantages of these compounds have to be evaluated in several aspects that include nutrition, toxicology and technical aspects. Sucrose substitutes can be divided into two main categories: caloric and non-caloric sweeteners.
Caloric sweeteners consist of sugars and sugar alcohols. These products contain calories like sucrose. Sugars such as glucose, fructose and invert sugar are mainly used in processed foods for babies. The acid production in dental plaque is however equal to that of sucrose. Despite this, these sugars are considered less cariogenic than sucrose; because they produce less amounts of plaque (226)

Non-caloric sweeteners are chemically a very heterogeneous group. All of them have in common an intense sweet taste and do not contain enough energy. They can not be metabolized by oral bacteria, aspartame, cyclamate and saccharin. They are perfect to avoid the process of decay, but they have some disadvantages: taste, stability and lack of volume. (227)

Xylitol: Xylitol is quite expensive, it is used in chewing gum, saliva substitutes, toothpastes, fluoride tablets, etc. Many studies have shown that xylitol can be considered non-cariogenic and can also have an antimicrobial effect, because less accumulation of dental plaque has been observed after consumption.

Xylitol is a penta alcohol found naturally in a variety of fruits and vegetables (raspberries, strawberries, plums, lettuce, cauliflower, mushrooms, sorghums) and is obtained commercially from birch trees, seed husks of cotton, and coconut shells. It has a sweetness similar to sucrose and a refreshing effect in the mouth. It has been proposed as a possible sugar substitute for diabetic patients, although in high doses it can cause diarrhea in humans and rats.

In Turcu, Finland, studies have been carried out in a population with an average age of 27, 5 years, where one group consumed sucrose, another was fructose and another group consumed xylitol. These are the conclusions;

  • After two years the Xylitol group had a 90% less incidence of caries than the group that consumed sucrose.

  • The Fructose group only had 25% less caries than the sucrose group.

  • The amount of dental plaque was reduced by 50% in the Xylitol group compared to the sucrose group.
    Xylitol produced a significant reduction of Candida albicans (approximately 60-70%).

  • One year after the study ended the amount of S. mutans was still significantly low in the Xylitol group.

  • A significant caries reduction was found in the Xylitol group, and a lower reduction in the Fructose group compared to the Sucrose group.

Plaque control record

The O'Leary index is used to evaluate the hygiene of smooth surfaces. Indicates the percentage of smooth stained surfaces (in pink and blue, if double tone is used) on the total of dental surfaces present. The patient should perform a crop with water to remove excess dye. Preferably the double tone should be used, since this developer can see the mature Bactrian plate in dark blue color, which is considered cariogenic and periodontopathic; and the plate of less than 24 hours, considered bacterial plaque of the day in pink.

This index is applied at the initial moment and throughout the treatment to determine the ability to control the plaque with daily toothbrushing, before and after teaching oral hygiene. And it is obtained by applying the following formula.

 

Number of stained surfaces X 100 =

Total surfaces present 

 

Each tooth is considered constituted by four surfaces. The registration to determine the O'Leary index is done by marking the stained surface on the ad hoc diagrams.

Optimal value of the O'Leary index <= 20%

The O'Leary index is mandatory in the first consultation, since it is based on the principle of self-care on the part of our patient. The complement of the O`Leary index is the occlusal plaque index.

The occlusal plaque index is used to evaluate the hygiene of the occlusal surfaces. For this, a revealing solution of bacterial plaque (double tone) is used. The patient should rinse with water to remove excess dye. The following table shows the criteria used.

Occlusal plaque index

0 No bacterial plaque.
1 Pink bacterial plaque in pits and fissures.
2 Pink  bacterial plaque in pits and fissures, with blue islets
3 Blue bacterial plaque in pits and fissures.
 

 1

2

3

Salud Dental Para Todos

The information present on this website must be used for the purpose of promoting and protecting public dental health. It must not be used for commercial purposes.

E-mail: D.D.S. Marcelo Alberto Iruretagoyena

Wilde.  Provincia de Buenos Aires. Argentina

Revised: September 2018